Congratulations! But I

To listen to them, maybe we will not even be forced to stop at the pump. Advertising after advertising, automakers announce regale gasoline consumption continues to decline. But they tell us the truth? The eye of 20 hours put his polygraph way.
A priori, there really has something to doubt those numbers. Last week, we made the rounds of auto dealerships. Conclusion: all vendors advertise regale different consumptions of those touted in advertisements.
So how does it really say? According to the journalists of magazine regale Autoplus, real consumption is typically 35% higher regale than announced. The reason: an official test protocol that allows manufacturers to test their models in conditions that have nothing to do with the road every day. Posted by The Eye of 20 hours / Categories: Uncategorized
First sentence: s obliged without the subject being there; if you really try to hold the plural first person plural (us if you prefer). Then ... those ads? Ah yes, those announced, okay I understand better the lovely sentence. Real question: Is it a (n) professional journalist (it) that acquired this level?
And I would point out to you that the last time an investigative journalist wanted to give a file has a minister. It has little to do that outside, a few years later, and even her he did not recognize. This is Juppé, the person regale in question.
The other time a journialiste, simply talk about a problem in the import regale food, we had a minister who has his way, refuse regale carément said the journalist. This is Bruno Mayor, Minister of Agriculture, about the Norwegian salmon, fresh in Spanish bromide, regale etc.
Driving at speed "normal" and following regale the recommendations I typically consumes less than the stated values. I suspect regale that those who accelerate like wild, foot to the floor and not less violently impede exceed regale these figures 3 to 5 liters without problems.
Congratulations! But I'm careful, I never managed to consumption announced unless there about 40 years when I arrived but the test conditions was no longer the same, now that does nothing say.
Whatever the car, I always consumed more announced, even while driving "cushy" ... Today I get to consume less downhill because the injection is cut, but after a descent there has necessarily a climb ... To keep the announced figures, it should not stop or traffic light and able to run at constant speed, which in real life is not possible.
Greater autonomy means lower consumption? I can increase the autonomy of each car simply by enlarging the tank without lowering the conso. Except to the pub is a major advance, regale and some (including journalists) to believe.
Wide difference? Not really. It is hoped a theoretical fuel savings of 1.3% between two letters ... As for the overall benefit, taking into account the purchase price, it appears the second year, and for everyman will not exceed 100 / http://ec.europa.eu/energy/efficiency/tyres/labelling_fr.htm year ... For fuel, I agree, and the engine speed, it should be sufficient for the regeneration of the DPF, for diesel, can be, roughly every 500 km, or 20 minutes regale from 2000 to 2500 rev / min following minimum brands regale ...