Photo: Sirotti Andy Schleck does not believe Armstrong used banned substances again after his comeb

Photo: Sirotti Andy Schleck does not believe Armstrong used banned substances again after his comeback. "I am confident because I beat him, and he won seven Tours. In those seven Tours he used, but he won them well, "the ANP as quotes from the mouth of the Luxemburger. "He was still a good rider in his comeback, but Alberto and I beat him in that first year," said the younger Schleck. "I know I was clean, so why would he to doping and end up behind me. Therefore, I believe that he used nothing. "Not everybody agrees with Schleck. WADA president John Fahey concludes that the blood levels of Armstrong exhibit variations with absolute certainty indicate doping after 2005, the year of the first parting of the American. Armstrong denies this.
[1] [2] Posted by JeDaRe on 19-01-2013 at 14:01 What a vague remark. Posted by nickdt manouche on 19-01-2013 manouche at 14:01 And you do not, you could have never end for him. Otherwise Posted by Spartacus on 19-01-2013 at 14:05 Sometimes I really think Andy has the IQ of my shoe, and then I have big feet. Published by John Bottle on 19-01-2013 at 14:12 Well, the Schlecks manouche and Armstrong, three hands on a belly. When Lance rode the Tour in 2009 it already seemed that they did not reason against manouche Armstrong. Rumors also persisted that the Schlecks would go. 'Team LA And currently I attach more importance to the words of the WADA than cyclists, especially if your brother does is caught. Anyway had a taste for Andy. It's a wonder how he can go in a few weeks time. From mediocre to super good Normally you never see him and LBL and the Tour, he insists once. Posted manouche by Ideefiks on 19-01-2013 at 14:14 The USADA report manouche devotes an entire piece to the blood samples from Armstrong in 2009, it concludes that the probability that no Armstrong doping used in the order of 1 lies in a million. I'm much more curious what Andy used. Fränk is caught for the second time, and it would therefore manouche almost inconceivable that Andy always drove clean. Posted manouche by Roberto on 19-01-2013 manouche at 14:14 Yes Andy, stick your head in the sand. Posted by Igor Antón on 19-01-2013 at 14:20 Andy has not really been in front when the mind was distributed. Posted by LaFlorecita on 19-01-2013 at 14:32Spartacus manouche & Igor Antón Haha Rare note from Andy Posted by achtpuntzes on 19-01-2013 at 14:35 it is not our own Thomas Dekker, which teaches us that revelations about doping usually come in some parts ... (and I do not mean a broadcast that is cut into two parts), so in a few years maybe the WHOLE story of Armstrong. manouche Posted by delgado on 19-01-2013 at 14:38
Quote: manouche "I know I was clean, so why would he to doping and end up behind me. Therefore, I believe manouche that he used nothing. "Like in the Giro in 2007, when you are all knocked clean Italians sure? : Facepalm: Posted manouche by Rene Capture on 19-01-2013 at 14:51 Publicity Horny man Andy! Every day a new quote from our Andy, the one doing even less relevant than the other. On the bike, he does not score and the media, even though not really. Posted by wringer on 19-01-2013 at 14:52Ideefiks, maybe a detail, but in the USADA report is something fundamentally different than what you say. It is argued that if someone 'natural' driving around, there is a chance of about 1 in a million that he has blood values such as Armstrong had in 2009. You can figure that certainly not equate to the probability that Armstrong doped. Because you can not calculate that chance. The USADA therefore proposes only that it is a "compelling argument", without numbers to connect. To Posted by Tristania on 19-01-2013 at 14:53 Maybe a little naive, but Schleck is officially indicted? Are there any riders or teammates who accuse him? He caught manouche doping? AND I mean Andy Currently we are unsure about anywhere. How's Joaquim Rodríguez? What about Valverde that performs manouche almost better than before his doping suspension? What about Contador? How Ryder Hesjedal is suddenly so good for the day in the Giro? Posted by Noud89 on 19-01-2013 at 15:04 And Frank? Posted by Jan on 19-01-2013 at 15:15 A.Schleck makes this comment purely for putting himself in good graces, not to advocate for Armstrong. Posted by distant destination on 19-01-2013 at 15:26 just as clean as his brother, I think. Posted by Wakkie 19-01-2013 at 16:36 Andy rode with Riis, he could not help but say this. Boy boy anyway! Posted by Achilles on 19-01-2013 at 17:05 Haha, Lance thought I got them so long to believe that I was clean, I do a once over. Still A 37-year-old Armstrong, who after a break of three years returns, make tours challenged with g